Ask a chart-only tool about a symbol and you get a chart-only answer. Ask a headline feed and you get a mood. The premise of Full Analysis is that a real read on an asset requires several independent kinds of evidence — what money is doing, how it's positioned, what the asset is worth, what the crowd feels, what the macro backdrop allows, and what price structure shows — examined separately, then weighed together.
So that's literally how the pipeline is built: six evidence layers, each with its own data and its own read, and a seventh stage where MAX synthesizes them into a directional bias. You can watch it run, layer by layer:
The seven stages
1. Flow
The most current evidence: transactions happening now. For equities that means options flow, dark-pool activity, and large prints; for crypto it means exchange flows and what the large-wallet cohorts are doing. Flow answers the question the chart can't — not where price is, but who is moving size, and in which direction.
2. Positioning
Flow is the delta; positioning is the state. Open interest, funding rates, options positioning, and — for futures — how the major trader categories are committed. Positioning tells you where the market is crowded, which is where moves accelerate (a squeeze) or exhaust (nobody left to buy).
3. Fundamental
The slow layer: what the asset actually rests on. Earnings trajectory and valuation context for a stock; network activity, reserves, and on-chain health for a crypto asset. Fundamentals rarely time anything, but they set the gravity that the faster layers oscillate around.
4. Sentiment
Social momentum and news tone — measured, not vibed. Sentiment is most useful at its extremes and in its divergences: euphoria into resistance and despair into support are both information, and sentiment that disagrees with flow is often the more interesting signal.
5. Macro
No asset trades in a vacuum. Rates, the dollar, and the volatility regime decide how much risk appetite exists for anything. A thesis that's clean in isolation can be simply unavailable in a hostile macro tape — this layer is the check against analyzing a symbol as if the rest of the world were flat.
6. Technical
Price structure, deliberately last among the evidence layers: trend state, momentum, and computed levels — volume profile, anchored VWAPs, confluence zones where multiple methods agree. The technical layer is where any thesis has to cash out, because entries, invalidation, and targets all live at specific prices.
7. AI synthesis
Then MAX takes the six reads and does the analyst's job: weigh them by reliability and current relevance, notice where they agree and — more importantly — where they don't, and commit to a read. The synthesis isn't a vote count. Three lukewarm layers pointing up don't outrank strong flow pointing down; the layers have a hierarchy, and the write-up tells you which evidence carried the decision.
What comes out the other end
A completed Full Analysis gives you five things, all on one surface:
A directional bias
Bullish, Bearish, or Neutral — with Neutral as a first-class answer, not a failure state. When the evidence genuinely conflicts, the honest output says so.
Supporting AND conflicting evidence
Two lists, both rendered. The layers backing the bias, and the layers arguing against it — each with the specific data point that put it there.
The regime
The market environment the read lives in — trending or ranging, risk-on or risk-off — because the same evidence means different things in different regimes.
Levels
The computed prices where the thesis is confirmed, tested, or invalidated — so the bias connects to specific spots on the chart, not a general mood.
Cited sources
Every claim in the write-up traces to the data behind it. "Flow leans bullish" arrives with the flow that says so — you can audit the reasoning, not just read the conclusion.
Why dissent is rendered, not hidden
Most analysis products optimize for the feeling of clarity: pick a side, show the evidence that agrees, quietly drop the rest. It reads clean and it's quietly dishonest — because on any interesting symbol, the layers will disagree. Flow can lean bullish while positioning is stretched and macro is hostile. That's not noise in the analysis; that's the analysis.
Full Analysis shows the conflicting evidence in the same card as the supporting evidence, at the same size. If the bias is Bullish with two layers dissenting, you see exactly which two and exactly why. The bias tells you where the weight of evidence landed; the dissent tells you what has to be true for it to be wrong.
That does three things a picked-a-side-and-hid-the-rest design can't. It tells you how contested the read is — a bias with zero dissent and a bias with three dissenting layers deserve different treatment, even if the headline matches. It hands you the invalidation list: the conflicting evidence is precisely what to monitor, and a plain-English monitor on it takes one sentence. And it keeps the process auditable — when a read ages badly, you can go back and see which layer had it right, and calibrate how you weigh that layer next time.
Seven layers in, one directional bias out — with the argument, the counter-argument, and the receipts all on the table. That's the pipeline.
See all seven layers on your symbol
Run a Full Analysis and read the evidence — supporting and conflicting — for yourself. Start your 7-day trial.
Start 7-Day Trial →